October 5, 2005
AVIAN FLU:
'FRIGHTFULLY MUTABLE'...AND MIGRATING
KEY FINDINGS
**
Outlets contemplate risk of "mutation" and potential for
"global pandemic."
** East
Asian sources seek "resources and wisdom" through international
cooperation.
**
Negative commentary related to low vaccine production, distribution, and
storage.
** Some
say media has "exaggerated coverage" about the threat of a pandemic.
MAJOR THEMES
Threat of mutation creates 'chilling picture'-- Outlets stressed the danger of
"unpredictable mutations" that could turn the avian flu virus into a
"human to human killer."
Papers were divided about the chance of a pandemic; New Zealand's Timaru Herald and
Australia's liberal Sydney Morning Herald expressed uncertainty, but the
Taipei Times and New Zealand's Christchurch Press claimed the
question is not "if" but "when." Despite admitting that the mutation for human
transmission is the "only thing missing," enigmatic aspects of the
avian flu epidemic allowed some writers to speculate, as one analyst suggested,
a "pessimistic estimate" of "as many as 50 million
victims."
'Pandemics do not respect international
borders'-- Thailand's moderately
conservative Bangkok Post credited President Bush for "trying to
boost the worldwide fight that is necessary to prepare for a possible human
influenza pandemic." Though global
media criticized "slow progress," Germany's centrist Der
Tagesspiegel contended that "international cooperation will be
decisive in the end to prevent a looming disaster." Asian sources demanded "prompt and
transparent communication" and emphasized "preparedness,"
"awareness," and a "scientific solution" to prevent the
spread of avian flu. Singapore's
pro-government Lianhe Zaobao commented, "It is only through regional
meetings such as APEC we can hope to gather resources and wisdom to find a
solution."
Vaccine highlights North-South gap-- Some editorials seized on potential problems
surrounding the vaccine. Argentina's Clarin,
the Taipei Times, and Indonesia's Jakarta Post all claimed that
the vaccine is stored in "the warehouses of the rich countries," and
therefore "developing poor countries will suffer a lot more." One writer advised that an
"international stockpile of antiviral drugs" be established to "[make]
a vaccine available in affected countries in Asia." Hong Kong's South China Morning Post
stated, "Less than 50 governments...have submitted plans with the WHO for
dealing with a pandemic. Most are
wealthy Western nations--not the Asian countries where the...virus has
spread."
'Coverage has made society panicky'-- One observer noted that "information and
technology" must be used correctly to "avoid unreasonable confusion
and fear." Indonesia's
left-of-center Waspada accused
the mass media of "exaggerat[ing] coverage about the bird flu
virus." Another writer called it a
"challenge" to "provide information without spreading
alarm.... The competing tendencies are
'it won't happen here' complacency, 'there's nothing we can do' fatalism, or
'no precaution is too great' alarmism."
Prepared by Media Reaction Branch (202)
203-7888, rmrmail@state.gov
EDITOR:
Sarah Reed
EDITOR'S NOTE:
Media Reaction reporting conveys the spectrum of foreign press
sentiment. Posts select commentary to
provide a representative picture of local editorial opinion. Some commentary is taken directly from the
Internet. This report summarizes and
interprets foreign editorial opinion and does not necessarily reflect the views
of the U.S. Government. This analysis was
based on 28 reports from 18 countries September 9-October 1, 2005. Editorial excerpts are listed from the most
recent date.
EUROPE
GERMANY:
"The Virus Is Coming"
Centrist Der Tagesspiegel of Berlin noted
(10/1): "It sounds like a perfect
horror scenario: UN expert David Nabarro
warns that up to 150 million people could die if the avian flu 'leaps' from
animals to human beings. Is this
panic-mongering? There are three aspects
indicating that there is really reason to worry. First, the avian flu is the largest animal
epidemic that has ever been registered.
It is likely that the dissemination of H5N1 will sooner or later 'learn'
to adjust to human beings. Second, in
the course of the time, the virus has become increasingly dangerous.... Some people died of it, even though the virus
does not yet jump from man to man.
Third, when we look at history, we can see that pandemics appear on a
regular basis.... So there is reason to
be vigilant. But nevertheless, we are
not as helpless as we were in the past.
Quick action with the right drugs could help contain a pandemic. Since the virus does not know any borders,
international cooperation will be decisive in the end to prevent a looming
disaster."
ITALY:
"Mad Cow Syndrome Looms Over Poultry Industry"
Turin's centrist La Stampa commented
(Internet version 9/25): "The
nightmare is that avian flu might trigger a spiral of fear, alarmism, and
fall-off in consumption that will repeat the negative impact of mad cow
syndrome in the poultry rearing industry, which is currently worth 4.5 billion
Euros and is the sole self-sufficient sector, providing jobs for 180,000
people. Negative signs are already being
seen: The news about avian flu is not affecting consumption trends in the rest
of Europe. 'Only in this country has a
situation of uncertainty and alarm, which is swaying the Italians' purchasing
habits, come about,' Aldo Muraro, chair of the National Union of Poultry
Farmers, complained.... This is why the
Italian Government has decided to allocate 20 million Euros to support the
industry.... The information campaign
directed at the public also continues...on the eve of the Forli Fair (29
September to 1 October), Europe's largest exhibition devoted to white
meat."
RUSSIA:
"Beak Of Damocles"
Yekaterina Drankina wrote in business-oriented Den’gi
(9/30): "A 6,000-strong army of
veterinarians led by the Agriculture and Emergency Situation Ministries nipped
avian flu in the bud, leaving Siberian chicken farms unaffected. That the nation remained flu-indifferent
proved a blessing for many. In the
meantime, vets are determined to keep fighting, shifting their effort to South
Africa and Azerbaijan. They warn that,
unless they get the money for the program, avian flu will hit a vast area from
the Urals to Poland next year."
BELGIUM:
"Slowness Of EU Against Avian Flu"
The independent internet EUobserver wrote
(9/27): "Members of the European
Parliament (MEPs) have strongly criticized the EU's slow progress in preparing
for a possible breakout of the avian influenza pandemic in Europe. Defending the EU's action, health
commissioner Markos Kyprianou told the agriculture parliamentary committee...that
national governments have stepped up efforts to hammer out a proposed
legislative package on avian influenza by the end of December [and] some member
states have voluntarily adopted measures proposed in the directive, well in
advance of it coming into force. The EU
executive has agreed to initially provide around 0.8 million Euro to member
states to boost co-funding of the surveillance plans agreed in
Brussels.... But several MEPs in the
committee have questioned the slow progress in dealing with the possibility of
the emergence of a bird flu-related strain transmuting so it can affect
humans."
HUNGARY:
"Birds Of A Feather"
Zoltan Otvos noted in center-left Nepszabadsag
(9/28): "The avian flu virus called
H5N1 is frightfully mutable, but not yet evolving to the stage of a mutation
that is able to spread from one person to another. But it will be evolving…so we have to prepare
ourselves. According to a colleague of
mine the situation is similar to the Y2K computer misery. Then we were afraid that the machines would
go crazy and not manage the change of the millennium...although the comparison
is a unpleasant since at the moment we are not talking about technical
equipment but about a virus able to make anyone ill and against which no one is
yet immune. The competition to earn the
title 'The first to develop an effective prevention method' might also even
bring an abundant income in addition to professional glory. If somewhere a pathogen which can make humans
ill mutates, then according to optimistic estimates we are talking about two
million victims or as many as fifty million victims in the pessimistic
view."
MIDDLE EAST
UAE:
"Preparing For Avian Flu"
The official English-language news WAM
remarked (Internet version 9/27):
"The Avian Influenza Action Plan to counter the threat of a global
avian influenza outbreak has been prepared by the Environment Agency--Abu
Dhabi, EAD, in cooperation with other concerned agencies.... Avian influenza or bird flu, a potentially
dangerous infectious disease, since its first occurrence in Qinghai in China
has spread to several countries. Flu
infection has already been reported from 11 countries in South-east Asia, Russia,
Kazakhstan and Mongolia. Risks of the
disease spreading into Europe and Middle East seem imminent, with first
reported case in Finland.... It needs to
be taken into consideration that infectious diseases will not stop at the Abu
Dhabi Emirate borders. Therefore any
kind of surveillance measures, emergency response plans etc as above mentioned
will only be of limited value as a single not screened bird or other animal
from another emirate may lead to the spreading of infectious diseases in the
Abu Dhabi Emirate."
EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC
AUSTRALIA:
"Worse Than Terror"
Brendan Grabau, consultant pharmacologist for
the pharmaceutical continuing education program at Deakin University in
Melbourne Brendan Grabau, observed in
conservative national daily the Australian (9/16): "When Australian Nobel prize winner
Peter Doherty, federal Health Minister Tony Abbott and leading defense
strategist Hugh White all warn of a potential influenza pandemic, as they did
this week, it's a threat that needs to be taken seriously.... In a worst-case scenario, a pandemic is a far
greater threat than terrorism.... The
inclusion of a scientific solution in preparedness planning is optimistic but
perhaps the most important provision of all. For its best chance, Australia
must nurture research into new vaccines and treatments, and the industry behind
them.... To ensure Australia is
adequately protected from a pandemic, it is vital we support science and
innovation."
"The Odds Shorten On Australia Facing A
Deadly Test Of Its National Psyche"
Tony Abbott, Federal Minister for Health,
commented in liberal Sydney Morning Herald (9/16): "We don't know if or when a pandemic
might occur. We don't know how severe it might be. We do know that a Spanish flu-type pandemic
would be a public health challenge to exceed the worst environmental disaster
and to dwarf almost any conceivable terrorist atrocity.... An Australian assessment suggests that 'many
countries could experience mass panic, especially if the disease (as in 1918)
took its toll on the fit and the healthy' … The challenge is to provide
information without spreading alarm and to take prudent precautions in
proportion to the potential threat … The competing temptations are 'it won't
happen here' complacency, 'there's nothing we can do' fatalism, or 'no precaution
is too great' alarmism … A severe flu outbreak would test our national
character as well as our public health system."
CHINA (HONG KONG): "Beijing's Flu Plan Is Just What The
Doctor Ordered"
The independent English-language South China
Morning Post commented (Internet Version 9/30): "The mainland's introduction of a
color-coded emergency plan to prevent or deal with a flu pandemic is a welcome
development. It is a small but important
step up in preparations to cope with a potentially catastrophic global pandemic
which the World Health Organization says is inevitable.... Beijing has been refreshingly frank about the
risk of human-to-human transmission of a mutated bird-flu virus beginning on
the mainland and growing into a pandemic, and about shortcomings in the
country's preparedness to deal with it.
The Ministry of Health notes that historically China has been the first
area hit by a number of flu pandemics. But it adds that medical services and public
health are 'relatively weak', the surveillance system 'not perfect' and the
capability to produce vaccines and drugs 'backward'. Other measures under the emergency plan
include setting up an anti-influenza leading work group, surveillance networks,
laboratories and a flu and bird-flu database.
As the World Health Organization points out, the plan is focused on the
health sector. This is understandable,
but medical services cannot contain a pandemic without help from other
sectors. That is why the plan needs to
be broadened while there is still time.
Hong Kong has reason to take particular interest in the mainland's
preparations for a possible outbreak, given our city's close proximity to
Guangdong and the painful experience of the Sars outbreak which originated
across the border. Beijing's adoption of
an emergency plan and frankness about being unprepared is reassuring. It suggests that the mainland's failure to
reveal the full extent of the Sars outbreak during its early stages in 2003
will not be repeated.... There are
grounds for concern that the world is still not as prepared as it should be.
Public health experts have found that while many countries have emergency plans
to cope with major disasters or terrorist attacks, it is still difficult to
convince governments to plan for containing disease outbreaks. Less than 50 governments around the world
have submitted plans with the WHO for dealing with a pandemic. Most are wealthy western nations--not the Asian
countries where the H5N1 avian flu virus has spread. It is on Asia that experts are focusing in
trying to forecast the outbreak of a human pandemic. The mainland's emergency plan will,
hopefully, serve as an example for others."
"Bird Flu Danger Signs Should Be
Heeded"
The independent English-language South China
Morning Post said in an editorial (9/23):
"The world should heed a dire example of the danger of being
unprepared for a predictable human disaster.
The hurricane that devastated New Orleans was listed as one of the three
most likely catastrophes facing the U.S.
It is now history that the U.S. was not ready to deal with it. But if a superpower can be found wanting in
those circumstances, what chance does the world have of being prepared for the
danger of a flu pandemic developing from the present outbreaks of bird
flu?.... Two developments this week are
a reminder of the danger. World flu
experts are focusing on Indonesia, where the health minister has warned that
recent sporadic cases of bird flu in people in and around Jakarta have made an
epidemic there--and the risk of a pandemic--more likely. And two new research
papers say that many of the standard treatments for flu--both vaccines and
antiviral--are far less effective than previously thought because of the
growing resistance of viruses....
Globally, the WHO is on alert to mobilize and co-ordinate a fast
response to an early bird flu outbreak, including measures to prevent its
spread if possible. It has an agreement
with Roche, the makers of Tamiflu, to stockpile enough of the drug to send
emergency supplies to the site of an emerging epidemic. As Hong Kong learned from being unprepared
for the spread of SARS, an effective response will depend on prompt and
transparent communication of a suspected outbreak."
TAIWAN:
"Will Avian Influenza (H5N1) Become A Pandemic?"
Huang Yu-Cheng and Lin Tzou-yien wrote in
pro-independence, English-language Taipei Times (internet
version--originally published 9/19 in China Times) (9/23): "First, some strains are known to be
highly pathogenic (usually fatal to animals) and it has already become endemic
among animals in various areas in Asia.
Second, in the past two years, the disease has affected a greater number
of animal species. Third, transmission
to humans has already occurred in Vietnam and Thailand, with a high fatality
rate. The only element lacking at
present is an increased capacity for human-to-human transmission. Once the H5N1 virus becomes a flu infecting humans,
it has the potential to become a global pandemic. Many experts predict an avian-flu pandemic is
inevitable, and only a matter of time.
The best way to prevent avian flu is by means of vaccination. But to develop and mass produce an effective
vaccine in the near term is virtually impossible. Although currently there are not enough cases
of avian flu infection to carry out meaningful clinical trials of the two drugs
on humans, Tamiflu or Relenza have been effective against the virus in Vietnam
and Thailand, and if early diagnosis and treatment also produce an encouraging result,
the World Health Organization (WHO) will suggest that each country stockpile a
sufficient supply of these anti-viral drugs.
But these drugs are expensive and their production is also limited... [I]f a pandemic has been declared, the
necessity for early diagnosis and treatment with drugs goes without
question. Taiwan's pharmaceutical
companies should have the ability to produce anti-viral drugs such as Tamiflu,
and be encouraged to negotiate with Swiss drug maker Roche and British drug
maker GlaxoSmithKline to import cheaper drugs.
Another option would be for Taiwan to become licensed to produce these
drugs when any country shows signs of an imminent outbreak. The WHO strongly recommends every country
stockpile a sufficient amount of anti-viral drugs. Some northern European countries and Japan
already have plans to store at least 25 percent of their population's total
requirement. Taiwan's stockpile will be
just four percent next year. The
government, the Legislative Yuan and the medical community should cooperate to
achieve better results."
"Flu Research Needs Means Testing"
Hsieh Yen-yao, Vice President of the Koo
Foundation's Sun Yat-sen Cancer Foundation, noted in pro-independence,
English-language Taipei Times (9/9):
"In contrast to the heated debate on the arms-procurement package,
the government, which regards the bird flu epidemic as a threat to national
security, has not hesitated to allocate NT$30 billion to purchase vaccines and
other preventive measures. This budget
was approved without causing any controversy.
No one seems to have questioned this action. This is because certain interest groups have
used the statements made by the World Health Organization (WHO) and foreign
experts to convince the public.... [W]e
want to question the accuracy of the predictions that more than 5 million
people would be infected and at least 10 thousand people would die if a
potential bird flu epidemic strikes Taiwan next March. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration
approved the use of Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate) to treat patients diagnosed
with flu but without any other complications.
In other words, Tamiflu has not been shown to prevent life-threatening
conditions such as pneumonia. This is to
say that Tamiflu cannot save the lives of people facing complications from
pneumonia resulting from avian flu. The
WHO hasn't released any documents saying that Tamiflu is an effective treatment
for avian flu, nor has it urged countries to purchase a sufficient amount of
Tamiflu and store it for later use....
Zanamivir, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, is a medication similar to
Roche's Tamiflu, but it was not widely promoted so it was neglected in favor of
Tamiflu, which the government bought in great volume despite evidence it was
ineffective against avian flu. This was
done in violation of the Government Procurement Act and the Pharmaceutical Act,
and goes against medical principles.
Take note that Taiwan's resources are limited, and the budget for avian
flu should not be used to raise the diagnostic standard of Taiwan's doctors and
to improve the treatment for pneumonia, rather than spending on developing new
vaccines that have no guarantee of success.
And instead of purchasing Tamiflu, the money would be better spent on
developing new kinds of respirators.
Marcus Reidenberg, a professor of pharmacology at Cornell University,
has written that in the past, when science and clinical pharmacology were not
well developed, doctors would often use, with the best possible intentions,
treatments that were harmful to patients or for which the dangers greatly
exceeded efficacy. This was because the
means were not available to test the safety and effectiveness of the treatment,
and they can be forgiven because they acted with the highest motives. Means for the testing of pharmaceuticals is
now available, and if such mistakes are made again, doctors should no longer
benefit from the public's forgiveness, however high their motives may be."
JAPAN:
"Bird Influenza; Avoid
Illegal Vaccine"
Conservative Sankei commented (Internet
Version 9/11): "Infections of the
H5N2 avian influenza virus have become evident one after another in Ibaraki and
Saitama prefectures. Japan's infection
preventive measures are now being put to the test. Since the outbreak of the avian flu in
Yamaguchi prefecture in January last year after an absence of 79 years, the
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan [MAFF] has made it a
fundamental measure to kill all the birds in a poultry farm where an infected
bird is found. The reason for the need
to fully enforce measures against an infectious source is that if the avian flu
spreads, it is highly possible that a new-type virus, which is highly
infectious to human beings, will appear.
Applying the brakes on the epidemic at the level of birds is the basic
premise of the global approach to a new-type virus. The virus that triggered the epidemic last
year was the highly-virulent H5N1-type....
Because the virus this year is a weak strain of the H5N2-type, the
degree of shock was not greater than last year.
But, dealing with a weak strain of virus is more difficult since there
is a risk of the virus spreading quietly without notice. Moreover, there is also a risk that a less
virulent strain of the virus could change to a highly-virulent virus if the
epidemic is protracted. We cannot
underestimate that. Meanwhile, if
infections, which spread in silence, are confirmed one after another, and birds
are killed each time, poultry farmers will cry for help. The poultry farming industry held an
emergency news conference on 8 September to call for the allowance of the use
of a vaccine. The MAFF does not permit
the use of the bird flu vaccine because of the following reasons: 1) if virus
inactivation (eliminating infectability) is inadequate, the vaccine will be a
source of infection; and 2) the increase in the number of birds, which do not
become sick even though they are infected, would delay grasping the extent of
the epidemic and primary care. Moreover,
the MAFF expert committee presented the view on the recent epidemic that it is
undeniable that the use of the vaccine is the transmission route. Hypothetically speaking, if the vaccine that
is unapproved for the use within Japan could be obtained by smuggling or
illicit production, the risk of using an insufficiently inactivated vaccine
will increase accordingly. That could
cause the good measures to work negatively.
The MAFF needs to present a convincing scientific basis and continue the
efforts to proceed with reasonable measures as well as to strongly boost the
poultry farming industry's awareness not to cause such things."
INDONESIA:
"Are We Capable Of Coping With The Deadly Bird Flu?"
Andrio Adiwibowo, a researcher, wrote in
independent English-language The Jakarta Post (Internet version,
9/28): "[T]here is not enough
vaccine or antiviral medicine available to protect more than a handful of
people, and no industrial capacity to produce a lot more of these medicines
quickly. At the very least, developing
poor countries will suffer a lot more than the developed world. The majority of the world, including all the
poor countries of South Asia and Africa where, history tells us, pandemics are
likely to hit especially hard, will have no access to expensive antivirals or
scarce vaccines. It is even doubtful
whether the minimal medicines available to respond to an initial outbreak are
adequate. Correspondingly, immediate
steps should be taken to improve monitoring and the assessment of the risk of
pandemic influenza in all countries where avian H5N1 viruses are present. Measures to reduce the threat of pandemic
influenza including developing an international stockpile of antiviral drugs
and making a vaccine available in affected countries in Asia should be
mandatory."
"Bird Flu Coverage Exaggerated"
Medan's left-of-center nationalist Waspada
explained (Internet version, 9/28):
"What happened is: the mass
media has exaggerated coverage about the bird flu virus. Such coverage has made society panicky. There has been no synchronicity which may
save our society or farm industry from the bird flu epidemic.... We should learn from advanced countries how
to develop farming industries and prevent the virus."
"Once Again On Avian Flu"
Leading independent daily Kompas commented
(9/26): "The avian flu outbreak
should not distract us from other diseases, such as polio, warned the World
Health Organization (WHO). Heads of
State who were present at the UN General Assembly meeting urged all nations to
fight avian flu as a contagious disease among humans and to prevent it becoming
a new pandemic. Without creating panic,
the avian flu outbreak should awaken people to health and disease issues. Let us improve our awareness, understanding,
and attention to disease, clean environment, and a hygienic life style.
Information and communication plays an important role in this matter. We are reminded of the global, simultaneous,
and interactive nature and role of mass media.
We have the technology and what we need now is the intelligence to use
the information and technology in an intelligent, wise, and effective manner to
avoid unreasonable confusion and fear."
"Again, Victims Of Avian Flu"
Leading independent daily Kompas
contended (9/20): "Without knowing
the cause and means of transmission of the disease, it is impossible to
eradicate and halt the spread of the avian flu virus. It is just a matter of time before more avian
flu cases appear. Blood samples will be
taken and people suspected of having the virus will be isolated and monitored
in Sualianti Saroso Hospital. Jakarta
Governor Sutiyoso even plans to close poultry husbandries in the city. Does the breeder who has been breeding
healthy poultry in a hygienic way have to close his husbandry and stop working
just because of avian flu? We have to be
practical. We need to solve the problem
based on the core of the problem. First
we need to trace Rini Dina's [recent avian flu victim] activities leading up to
her infection. Second, we need to
counsel farmers about appropriate husbandry management. Poultry vaccinations should also be
continued. Finally, we need a more
systematic method to eradicate avian flu."
MALAYSIA:
"Malaysia To Strengthen Avian Flu Prevention"
Government-influenced, Chinese-language Nanyang
Siang Pau commented (Internet version, 9/22): "The new outbreak of avian flu in
Indonesia has again caused four deaths and six infections. The Indonesian authority, who has declared
the avian flu outbreak in the country as an 'extraordinary' situation, has
further confirmed that the source of avian flu virus originated from a zoo in
Jakarta. In mid-July this year, this
fatal avian flu virus has already killed three people in Indonesia. With such repeated avian flu outbreaks
reported in Indonesia, countries like Malaysia cannot help but strengthen
preventive measures in an effort to stop the spread of this deadly virus from
getting into the country. Since Malaysia
does not import poultry products from Indonesia, we have to agree with the
Veterinary Services Department's assessment that Malaysia is a low-risk area as
far as avian flu is concerned. Yet, it
does not mean that we should take such a possibility lightly. We should recall that when the avian flu
virus spread from southern Thailand to our Kelantan state in August last year,
it took the government over a month to clean up the poultry farms in the
north.... Looking at the global avian
flu situation from a broader perspective, it is indeed alarming to note that
the avian flu virus has already spread north to affect countries such as
Russia, Japan and the former Russian states.
Further south, ASEAN nations such as Vietnam, Indonesia and Cambodia are
also avian flu-affected areas. It is
thus extremely important for the government, besides checking on poultry farms
and tourism-related sectors such as restaurants, transportation and custom
check points, to also pay attention to the movement of the migratory birds to
prevent them carrying this deadly virus across the national boundary and ending
up in Malaysia."
"ASEAN Nations Should Strengthen Links To
Curb Spread Of Avian Flu"
Independent, Chinese-language Oriental Daily
News noted (Internet version, 9/22):
"The fear of an avian flu epidemic has caused great concern for the
region. Now that more avian flu cases
are reported in Indonesia, all other Southeast Asian countries, especially
Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines, have a reason to worry not
only about the threat of avian flu to human lives but also its impact to the
regional economy as a whole. It is thus
very wise of our Agriculture minister, Muhyiddin, to take an early step in
informing and clarifying with the World Health Organization that Malaysia is
free from avian flu and that our poultry products are safe for human
consumption. This is the only way we can
protect our poultry export trade. Yet
many foreign countries have the tendency to lump all the five Southeast Asian
nations, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines
as a common group. These foreign
countries have the wrong perception that if something dreadful happened to any
of these countries, whether it is a
terrorist attack haze or the avian flu phenomenon, similar situations
would also occur in the rest of the Southeast Asian nations. With such a wrong perception in mind,
Malaysia's tourism industry would always become affected by such regional
affairs. Nevertheless, it is also time
for us to realize that the threat and spread of the avian flu epidemic to the
region can be very serious and real. We
do not have the ability to confine or isolate this avian flu virus to just one
country. No country should think that it
can be immune from it. The region must
strengthen communication links to prevent, curb and support one another in time
of need."
NEW ZEALAND:
"How Real Is The Asian Bird Flu Threat?"
An editorial in the Timaru Herald asked
(Internet version, 9/27): "How real
is the Asian bird flu threat here in South Canterbury, and should people be
doing more to protect themselves against it?
News that supplies of the anti-bird flu drug Tamiflu are being snapped
up as quickly as they come into the country will come as a surprise to many,
and have some wondering if they should be joining the queue. The answer is not simple. Certainly, the drug
is a form of health insurance that you may or may not need, but at $ 70 to $ 80
per course per person, cost will be a factor.... The real fear though is what might happen if
the flu develops the capability to infect human to human. Many experts say this is a matter of when,
not if, while others are less sure. What
is more widely accepted is if the flu does mutate into a human-to-human killer,
the threat to the whole world becomes very real. In New Zealand, the Government
has committed $ 26 million so far in preparation. It has ordered enough Tamiflu to protect 20
per cent of the population, with priority going to those in the front- line
fight against it, like doctors and nurses.
It has also ordered masks and other equipment to help contain the
spread, and has 26 part and full-time staff on pandemic planning projects. Is that enough? Too many 'ifs' and 'buts' still exist. If bird flu does mutate, will it reach New
Zealand? If it does, how virulent will
it be? Will some people be more
susceptible than others? Will Tamiflu by
then offer the right protection?
Auckland University infectious disease physician Mark Thomas says if an
outbreak is extensive, the country will probably feel it has been 'hopelessly
underprepared'. That's fair comment, but
so is the one from Mark Jacobs, the Director of Public Health, who says we
should all be thinking about what we can do to prepare for the worst--while
hoping and working for something better than that. And 'we' is the operative word there.... Sure, the Government could be doing a lot
more on our behalf, but you can't realistically practice for something like this.
It's a question of balance and risk assessment, and that falls to individuals
as well."
"A Chilling Picture"
The top-circulation Press of Christchurch
editorialized (Internet version, 9/17):
"Ask most New Zealanders what poses the greatest potential threat
to our society and way of life and, chances are, the answers would focus on
earthquakes, storms or tsunami. Yet far
more cataclysmic would be the mutation of the avian flu virus H5N1 into a
strain which could spread easily from human to human. Medical experts, including the World Health
Organization, are painting chilling pictures of the global impact of this, many
likening its potential virulence to the flu pandemic of 1918 which killed up to
50 million people. The worst news of all
is that experts are adamant that it is not a question of if an avian flu
pandemic erupts, but when....Some New Zealanders are evidently aware of the
threat, as reflected in the growing numbers buying the antiviral drug Tamiflu.
Generally, however, there appears to be a lack of awareness of the threat. This might be because it is perceived to be a
South East Asian problem, although cases of birds dying have also been detected
in Siberia. Besides, pandemics do not
respect national borders. The low
awareness might also be due to the fact that the full horror of the well
publicized Sars virus did not eventuate in New Zealand..... It is true that it is not clear how effective
Tamiflu is with respect to avian flu.
Yet on the one hand the ministry is stockpiling the drug and warning
that health services will find it hard to deal with a pandemic. On the other, it has done nothing to
facilitate public access to the drug.
Health authorities must acknowledge that the public is entitled to good
information about the drug and, if the avian flu threat is so dire, access to
it.... The question also remains as to
whether the ministry, despite its website having extensive information on avian
flu, should be doing more to raise public recognition of this potential
threat. Obviously the risk of
scare-mongering must be avoided. The aim
must be to educate, but not panic, the public about the nature of the
illness--as the ministry did successfully with the Sars threat. It is the lack of information which creates
the environment in which public panic can develop. An informed public would also recognize the
need for what might otherwise be viewed as draconian response measures, such as
shutting schools, airports and other facilities. Above all, the ministry must ensure that it
retains the confidence of the public as it prepares to tackle a possible flu
pandemic.... As New Zealand braces
itself for the potentially devastating impact of an avian flu pandemic, it is
this combination of public awareness and public confidence in the ministry
which could be a vital weapon in the fight."
PAPUA NEW GUINEA: "High Alert"
The mass-circulation Port Moresby Post
Courier wrote (Internet version, 9/28):
"Papua New Guinea is on high alert in light of a threat posed by
the deadly bird flu virus that is spreading across Asian countries, including
neighboring Indonesia. The National
Agriculture Quarantine and Inspection Authority [NAQIA] is stepping up
surveillance measures due to the migratory routes of birds from northern China
and Central Asia that could possibly carry the flu to PNG. The birds would be flying over PNG to
Australia for the summer."
PHILIPPINES:
"Fund To Wipe Out Bird Flu"
The privately owned English-language Philippine
Star remarked (Internet version, 9/30):
"The United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the
World Health Organization (WHO) and the Paris-based Office International des
Epizooties or OIE are pushing for the establishment of a $102-million fund to
bankroll a proposed three-year global strategy to eliminate the dreaded avian
influenza (AI) or bird flu virus that is ravaging billion-dollar poultry
farming worldwide. This proposed global
strategy was prompted by increasing human deaths in affected countries and is
also a means to prevent it from spreading in countries that are still free from
bird flu according to the chief technical adviser of the FAO regional office
for Asia and the Pacific."
SINGAPORE:
"Region Should Accept Suggestion To Include Avian Flu On APEC
Agenda"
Pro-government Chinese-language morning daily Lianhe
Zaobao stated (Internet version, 9/24):
"The recent spread of avian flu in Indonesia has caused the death
of three children. This development has
stirred great concern to the region as well as to the world community. While there is still no indication to show
that in Indonesia, the unpredictable mutations of the avian flu virus has
reached the stage to infect human-to-human, it remains crucial for the
Indonesian authority to take all possible precautions to prevent its spread in
the region. Indonesia is a large country
with dense population spread through all islands. It is thus a difficult and massive task for
the authorities to effectively control the spread of avian flu. There is an urgent need for Jakarta to adopt
a new strategy to prevent the spread of avian flu and to educate the 30 million
poultry farmers to cooperate with the government to prevent the spread of avian
flu. In addition, we should also accept
the suggestion coming from the United States and Australia in putting the
agenda on the prevention of avian flu in the next coming APEC Summit. It is only through regional meetings such as
APEC we can hope to gather resources and wisdom to find a solution to prevent
avian flu becoming a health threat to humanity."
THAILAND:
"Poor Response Towards Bird Flu"
Top-circulation, moderately conservative,
English-language Bangkok Post editorialized (9/28): "U.S. President George W. Bush deserves
some credit for trying to boost the worldwide fight that is necessary to
prepare for a possible human influenza pandemic. Speaking to the United Nations General
Assembly meeting earlier this month, Mr. Bush unveiled 'a new international
partnership' to fight avian flu and to prepare for a possible human
outbreak.... The response to avian flu
so far has been somewhat wishy-washy. On
one hand, political leaders have been seen taking steps. On the other experts,
with some notable exceptions that include the UN's own World Health
Organization, have acted slowly or not at all in preparing for possible
biodisaster."
"Thai-U.S. Relations On Cruise
Control"
Independent English-language The Nation
stated (9/21): "The letter signed
by 11 U.S. Congressmen submitted to Bush on September 12 underscored real
issues concerning Thai-U.S. relations.
The letter urged Bush to publicly raise issues related to democracy and
civil liberties and Thailand’s continued support for Burma. Somehow, Bush failed to do that. Instead, he praised Thailand’s efforts to
combat the spread of bird flu. For want
of anything better to say, Bush said Thaksin is 'a good friend and a very
thoughtful leader' when it comes to the effort to contain the spread of the
potentially devastating flu pandemic.
Bush told the press that Thailand leads in putting systems in place that
will track the viruses that attack different birds, and will watch very
carefully to make sure that there is no bird-to-human transmission in the
country. Well, when the bilateral
relations are in trouble, talking about bird flu does provide an opportunity
for kind words."
WESTERN HEMISPHERE
ARGENTINA:
"Epidemic May Lead To Global Political Crisis"
Oscar Raul Cardoso commented in leading Clarin (10/1): "The avian flu (H5N1) has now reached
two of three conditions which turn it into a clear and present threat: it now has
characteristics against which the human being has no immunity or natural
defenses and it has proved that it may move between species. The only thing it's missing is a mutation
which will allow it to combine with other elements of the human body and this
is what scientists foresee may take place any moment now. Obviously, it's impossible to have a vaccine
for a disease that is still unknown....
But if the threat becomes real, experts believe there won't be a vaccine
in time or in enough quantities and the anti-virus will remain in the
warehouses of the rich countries that may buy it and it will also be scarce;
this is another instance in which we will be trapped by the inscrutable will of
the market."
"Avian Flu:
Listen, Take Action"
Marcelo Cantelmi, an editor for leading Clarin,
wrote (10/1): "The threat of this
disease mustn't be evaluated for its dangerousness only, but for the
difficulties the world faces to fight it with efficacy. Most of the shots against this virus are
produced by only nine nations: Australia, Great Britain, Canada, France,
Germany, Italy, Japan, Holland and the U.S., most of them G-8 members and the
most industrialized countries. In its
last edition, The Economist warns that these countries are only capable of
producing 300 million vaccines a year, very little to deal with a global
pandemic of a more severe variety of the virus.
In case of a sanitary emergency, even these countries may limit or ban
exports of the vaccine. 'Without an international agreement right away, there
will be a high risk of lack of vaccines, inequity and delay to provide the
medicine,' says the prestigious British medium. It's a warning. But it's crucial that it arrives in time. There's a long history of recent warnings
that weren't heard, and which left a trail of death and despair."
##
Office of Research | Issue Focus | Foreign Media Reaction |
This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State. Links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein. |
IIP Home | Issue Focus Home |