October 26, 2005
'POLAND BELONGS TO THE TWINS' LECH &
JAROSLAV KACZYNSKI
KEY FINDINGS
** Papers welcomed the
winners but can only speculate on their "program of governance."
** Media concerned that
Kaczynski will strain Warsaw's ties with Berlin, Moscow and Brussels.
** Many fear the Kaczynskis
will take more than "two steps to the right."
** EU writers saw a
"worrying" anti-market, anti-pluralism "signal from Eastern
Europe."
MAJOR THEMES
'Congratulations' to winners 'Kaczynski & Kaczynski'-- While media welcomed
"national-conservative" Lech Kaczynski as Poland's new president,
many believed the result showed "how divided the country is." A Romanian analyst proclaimed, "The real
test begins now" as the winner tries to form a "strong
government" in coalition with a "weak opposition." Poland's centrist Rzeczpospolita
declared, "We are waiting" to see how governance will go as liberal Gazeta
Wyborcza negatively opined, "It would be a bad thing if the governance
of Poland were dominated by the party that fears modernity, Europe, tolerance,
market economy."
Warily eyeing 'conflict-prone hardliner' Lech
Kaczynski-- Russian analysts noted
that "difficult Lech" upholds "conservative Catholic values and
criticizes Russia and Germany," at a time when Russian-Polish relations
"couldn't be worse."
Business-oriented Kommersant held that "under Kaczynski, a
nationalist trend is likely to prevail in Polish policy toward Germany and united
Europe as a whole." Austrian
observers asked if Lech would "really risk permanent conflict with Germany
and Russia?" German writers
acknowledged the nations' relations hover around a "common history [that]
is dark," but expressed optimism Angela Merkel would "make clear to
the new leadership in Warsaw that Germany poses no threat to Poland." They further advised their EU partners to
"remain open-minded regarding the new leaders in Warsaw."
Forming an 'upright' and 'right-wing
conservative' government-- Hungary's
center-left Nepszabadsag pondered whether the new
"right-wing-conservative government will be compelled to continue the
international politics of its left-wing predecessor." But Indonesian and Irish outlets echoed,
"There is no strong center or left camp in the parliament" to check
Poland's "powerful twins" who won by "taking advantage of
support from the extreme right and populists." Many editorialists reacted to Kaczynski's Law
and Justice party prevailing by noting apprehensively that promises of building
a strong state might cater to "the 'upright,' the church-goers and the
anti-communists among the Poles."
'The new Warsaw leadership will be unusual'-- Independent Romania Libera pointed out
that while the new president may be anti-communist, it does not mean he
"has any sympathy at all for capitalism." Germany's left-of-center Berliner Zeitung
declared the Kaczynskis cannot ignore the global economy or EU connections
because EU subsidies are integral to Poland's budget. An Irish observer judged there would be
"satisfaction
in Washington that its pro-American line will be reinforced," even as Austria's independent Der
Standard emphasized the twins "distrust a pluralistic society, a
liberal market economy, the European Union, and fear the loss of national
identity and the repercussions of globalization."
Prepared by Media Reaction Division (202) 203-7888,
rmrmail@state.gov
EDITOR: Rupert D. Vaughan
EDITOR'S NOTE: Media
Reaction reporting conveys the spectrum of foreign press sentiment. Posts select commentary to provide a
representative picture of local editorial opinion. Some commentary is taken directly from the
Internet. This report summarizes and
interprets foreign editorial opinion and does not necessarily reflect the views
of the U.S. Government. This analysis
was based on 30 reports from 10 countries over October 24-26, 2005. Editorial excerpts are listed from the most
recent date.
EUROPE
BRITAIN:
"A Worrying Signal From Eastern Europe"
The left-of-center Independent
editorialized (10/25): "The choice
made by Polish voters shows that they--like the French, Dutch and Germans--are
not finding it easy to come to terms with globalization.... This election result should serve as a
reminder of how difficult economic reform in Europe will continue to be."
GERMANY: "Only One
Half"
Thomas Roser argued in centrist Der Tagesspiegel of Berlin
(10/25): "Poland's social and
political division will deepen under these polarizing patriots. The committed anti-Communist Kaczynski's
highest priority has always been to confront the country with its socialist
past. If he will now realize his
election promises, the country will be paralyzed by an endless debate about the
former security service. The election
result shows how divided the country is....
Kaczynski will never become a president for all Polish people like his
predecessor Kwasniewski, who was interested in social harmony. Patriotic pathos alone will not win the
hearts and minds of all Polish people....
Kaczynski wants to boost the relations with Washington, and he will
insist on Polish interests in the Europe.
It remains to be seen what role Warsaw will actually play in the
European Union. Pursuing its policies
against its partners too harshly could turn into a boomerang for Poland,
because the new member will rely on the European Union's solidarity and
understanding. In the past, Poland has
always been a reliable European partner.
The EU partners would be therefore well advised to remain open-minded
regarding the new leaders in Warsaw. In
the years to come, Poland will need Europe's spirit more than ever
before."
"Hello To Warsaw"
Herbert Kremp editorialized in mass-circulation, right-of-center
tabloid Bild-Zeitung of Hamburg (10/25):
"Not everybody is happy about the election of the
national-conservative Lech Kaczynski as Poland's new president. We hear mixed responses from Russia and the
European Union. But the candidate was
elected and Poland is a democracy, an important part of Europe and Germany's friend. The election campaign is over and the voters
have had their say. For those elected,
it usually is the time to turn from a party man into a statesman.... German-Polish relations are as important to
Germany as the one with France. We owe
this to history and the future.
Friendship is a feeling originating from mutual understanding. Our common history is dark; the memory of the
recent centuries is painful. Both sides
must deal carefully with this legacy.
Germans and Poles must sit together and pursue a dialogue. We welcome Lech Kaczynski as the new Polish
President."
"The Kaczynskis"
Thomas Urban observed in center-left Sueddeutsche
Zeitung of Munich (10/25):
"Poland relies on the EU; Brussels' billions of euros are already
part of Poland's budget for the next years.
The twins will soon speak in a more moderate language to Brussels. However, they will support forces inside the
EU who want to slow down the pace of the integration, who fight for an 'Europe
of fatherlands,' and they will find allies in London, Paris and Munich. The relationship with Berlin will be less
straightforward. Playing the anti-German
card in the election campaign has helped the brothers win the
elections.... The new German government
under Angela Merkel must make clear to the new leadership in Warsaw that
Germany poses no threat to Poland, and that the planned center for the history
of the expulsion, which the two Kaczynskis condemn as casus belli, will not
threaten Poland.... If Berlin succeeds
in convincing Warsaw that the controversial project, which cannot be stopped,
could be to Poland's advantage, there would be an opportunity for a thriving
political cooperation. The twins aren't
blind ideologists. They have often shown
in the past that they can find pragmatic compromises."
"The Brother"
Klaus-Dieter Frankenberger commented in
center-right Frankfurter Allgemeine (10/25): "Nobody in the European Union must sound
the alarm because Kaczynski's first visit will take him to America. In security matters, Poland--like many other
countries in Central and Eastern Europe--trust the alliance's superpower rather
than European promises. It would be
awkward if it were different. The new
president of the largest new EU member will certainly be confident, at times uncooperative,
make claims and hold opinions which stem from a different era. The new Warsaw leadership will be
unusual."
"Poland In Europe"
Gerhard Gnauck noted in right-of-center Die
Welt of Berlin (10/25): "The
election winner will hesitate to join the euro zone. Many voters fear for the nation state--a
legacy of Poland's history--and the social welfare system. The new Poland will be a confident but
reliable partner in Europe."
"Polish Twin Solution"
Frank Herold wrote in left-of-center Berliner Zeitung
(10/25): "Poland is a member of the
European Union. It has accepted Europe's
values and will have to stick to them in the future. The conservatives will therefore not realize
certain election promises, such as the introduction of the death penalty. Moreover, unlike Kaczynski, the majority of
the people are happy with the country's EU membership, not just because Poland
is the greatest recipient of subsidy among the new EU members. The
new leaders will not be able to ignore this.
Neither can they disregard the fact that their country is closely tied
to the global economy."
ITALY: "Kaczynski
President, Poland Belongs To The Twins"
Alberto Pasolini Zanelli had this to say in pro-government,
leading center-right daily Il Giornale (10/24): "Poland, like only few other countries,
has experienced a spate of 'uncertain'
elections, and in many ways paradoxical....
Kaczynski succeeded in offering a more comprehensive 'plate,' offering a
different taste for each mouth, including nationalism, anti-Communism,
justicialism, Europe-skepticism, advocacy for welfare."
RUSSIA: "Difficult
Lech"
Irina Kobrinskaya commented in
business-oriented Vedomosti (10/26):
“The Polish vote is a lesson for all of post-communist Europe. The low turnout attests to alienation and
disappointment even in Poland, a developed democracy and civil society. With the left and democratic forces in Poland
down, the new President and Sejm may face a new situation, with one party
dominant and the opposition weak. This
increases the potential for instability, given serious social and economic
problems, primarily 18% unemployment.
This may become the EU’s headache, as well as Poland’s. Surely, the right conservatives’ victory is a
sign many Poles are unhappy about EU membership. At the same time, it fits the common European
political process, with nationalist trends coming in reaction to EU enlargement
and the growing power of supranational structures. The botched EU constitution referenda in
France and the Netherlands and its vague future are more reason for Warsaw to
seek closer ties with Washington.... As
for Russian-Polish relations, they couldn’t be worse. Even so, as time goes by, Russia’s
cooperation with the EU, its constructive relations with the United States, and
a healthy pragmatism in post-Soviet republics will have a greater impact as
strategic factors. Progress in those
areas will serve as a reliable safety valve and stimulus to better relations
with Poland, whoever its leader.”
"Polish Choice: What
It Means To Russia"
Anatoliy Shapovalov said on the front page of
official government-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta (10/25): “Poland’s new President upholds conservative
Catholic values and criticizes Russia and Germany (mostly for their joint
Baltic Sea gas pipeline project). Based
on his election statements, that seems to be true. Apparently, Kaczynski’s views don’t change
with time, meaning that he will steadfastly work to keep his election
promises.... Even though Moscow and
Warsaw at times see things differently, they need to try to understand each
other better. Poles and Russians are
sharply divided on postwar history. The
opinion in Warsaw is that the Soviet army occupied Poland, retarding its development. But Russia has its own interests to look
after. Also, Poles would do well to
remember that Russia saved their country from the Nazis in WWII.”
"Congratulations, Mr. Kaczynski!"
Maksim Yusin held in reformist Izvestiya
(10/25): “From the Russian perspective,
one might say that the vote outcome couldn’t have been worse. Speaking of Moscow, Lech Kaczynski made
harsh and, at times, insulting statements.
The irony is that we would have had it worse, if Kaczynski’s rival,
liberal Donald Tusk, had won the vote.
Tusk is a cautious, moderate and civilized politician. He, too, criticizes Russia, but he is less
given to emotion and sounds more argumentative than Kaczynski. With him as President, Washington, Brussels,
Berlin and London might have been more receptive. Not so with Kaczynski, who has discredited
himself with statements made to date. As
a politician, Kaczynski is a man from the past.
There are few like him in modern-day Europe, and even fewer in
power. Today’s Russian-Polish relations
are in the doldrums, with Moscow and Warsaw principal antagonists in
Europe. The antagonism won’t go away
very soon. Whoever gets elected in
Poland will oppose Russia’s interests, be it in the EU, NATO or post-Soviet
republics. So, the more vulnerable and
odious the candidate, the better.”
"We’ve Grown Far Apart Over The Past 15 Years"
Sergey Strokan commented in business-oriented Kommersant (10/24): "The latest Polish poll makes you feel
palpably how far we have grown apart over a mere one and a half decades, even
though our countries seemed to go in the same direction after the collapse of
the communist bloc. Today’s Poland,
ending a decade of the Kwasniewski presidency, enters into a new political era,
with the government beset by corruption scandals, its credibility badly
dented. We witnessed about the same when
the Yeltsin era drew to a close, with the popularity ratings of Russia’s first
democratic President plummeting to 6%.
But, similarities end there. In
Poland, they couldn’t have anything like Operation Successor we saw in this
country. In that lies the principal
difference between Russia and Poland, although both were formed out of the
Dzerzhinsky trench coat. Ruling out
anything like Operation Successor and no-alternative elections in a 'managed
democracy' is a distinctive feature of new democracies emerging in Eastern
Europe from the ruins of communism."
"Political Correctness Bad For Tusk"
Lev Bruni reported from Warsaw for reformist Vremya Novostey
(10/25): “There is nothing dramatic about Sunday’s vote outcome. Kaczynski and Tusk flew out of one and the
same nest, Solidarnosc. Clearly, it was
not politics that decided the Poles’ choice-both candidates are
center-right. Political correctness
played a dirty trick on liberal Tusk. He
is too correct, a typical European liberal of the new strain of political
bureaucrats who, being little different from one another, look like Barbie’s
boyfriend, Ken.... From experience, guys
with a ready tongue and guts often prove more pragmatic than political
liberals.”
"Law And Justice Prevail"
Boris Volkhonskiy observed in business-oriented Kommersant
(10/25): “Some actions and statements by Lech Kaczynski have already seriously
complicated Poland’s relations with EU partners, particularly its close
neighbor, Germany. Under Kaczynski, a
nationalist trend is likely to prevail in Polish policy toward Germany and
united Europe as a whole. Furthermore,
Lech Kaczynski has never been enthusiastic about wider ties with Russia.”
"Dudayev’s Fan To Run Poland"
Artem Mal’gin opined in centrist Nezavisimaya Gazeta
(10/25): “We need to take a closer look at Kaczynski now. Obviously, he is not the one to give
Russian-Polish relations a chance to improve.
That seemed plausible when Kwasniewski became President, but neither
side made an effort to use that chance.
Nonetheless, it doesn’t seem right to demonize Kaczynski. While his views are quite eclectic, something
of his eclecticism may come in handy.”
"Facing The West"
Nationalist opposition Sovetskaya Rossiya ran this by A.
Safarin (10/25): “Before the ballot,
Kaczynski went out of his way to show how much he disliked Russia, going as far
as likening Russians to Nazis. This is quite indicative of widespread
anti-Russian sentiment in Poland, with both candidates playing it up. But with Poland dependent on the vast
Russian market, oil and natural gas, Kaczynski’s tone changed immediately after
the vote. His ranting and attacks on Russia turned out to be mere election
rhetoric (some rhetoric!) With victory
secured, the new President hastened to declare that he will do his utmost to
normalize relations with Russia. By and
large, the world was not particularly intrigued by the Polish election, with
Poland seen as an undisguised satellite of the United States and a troublemaker
in the European Union.”
AUSTRIA: "A Strong
State--But Only For The 'Upright'"
Ingrid Steiner-Gashi, foreign affairs writer for mass circulation Kurier
opined (1025): "The Kaczynskis did
not win the election with their authoritarian law-and-order slogans. What
trumped was the right-wing brothers' leftist card. Years of economic shock
therapy and the harsh conditions of a market economy have hit the Poles full
force. Half the population is living below the poverty line. The poor, the
elderly, those with little education and the little-developed eastern part of
the country are clinging to the Kaczynski brothers' promise that Poland will
once again become a strong state--a state that will take care of its weakest
members as well. That would almost be a Social Democratic program if it did not
carry the underlying message that 'social warmth' is only for the 'upright,' the
church-goers and the anti-communists among the Poles."
"Pitch Black Is The Color Of Poland"
Foreign affairs writer for centrist Die
Presse Burkhard Bischof wrote (10/25):
"The election campaign was tough and dirty and it is by no means
certain that the wounds that the declared future coalition partners have
inflicted on each other in the fight over the presidency are going to heal.
Political experts in Poland predict the right-wing coalition union in Warsaw
will not last long. Re-introducing the death penalty, settling accounts with
communism and post-communism, rebuilding of the entire state, redistribution of
wealth from the rich to the poor--the domestic program of the victorious
Kaczynski twins is radical. However,
Europe is eager to see how the Poland of the Kaczynskis will affect its EU
partners and eastern neighbors. Will the
next Polish President, conflict-prone hardliner Lech Kaczynski, really risk
permanent conflict with Germany and Russia?
Does he really believe he will serve Poland's interests best through
very close association with Washington?
Perhaps this was all just campaign rhetoric and the new head of state
will turn out to be a pragmatic in the best Polish tradition. Hopefully!"
"Polish Contradictions"
Josef Kirchengast, foreign affairs writer for
independent Der Standard remarked (10/25): "Whatever else you say about the
Kaczynski twins, they are political pros with the necessary sense of the
possible. The moderate statements of future President Lech Kaczynski already
indicate this. In their foreign and European policy the two brothers will find
themselves confronted with reality very soon. Brussels's criticism of Lech's
call for the death penalty came right after election day and the message was
clear: Those who belong to the club have
to respect its rules. The situation is similar with regard to external
security. Although the newly elected
President may choose the U.S. as the destination for his first official trip
abroad, this does not change Poland's geographic situation. Likewise, the harsh tones in the direction of
Germany will soon give way to a more pragmatic course, albeit accompanied by
tougher rhetoric. Things are not going to go smoothly for Poland's powerful
twins. After all, they owe their
election victory mostly to distrust and fears resulting from it: Distrust of a pluralistic society, liberal
market economy, the European Union, fear of the loss of national identity and
the repercussions of globalization. It
will take true statesmanship to turn these defensive reflexes into a positive
dynamic for the country. Lech and
Jaroslav Kaczynski will not have much time to achieve that."
CZECH REPUBLIC:
"Poland Of Kaczynski Twins?"
Tomas Nemecek noted in business daily Hospodarske noviny
(10/24): "It is in our interest for
Poland to be pro-European and Western and economically liberal. This vision, without a doubt, would have been
better fulfilled by the Civic Platform of Donald Tusk.... Fortunately enough, Polish foreign policy has
the strong tradition of continuity as an ally of the U.S., self-confident voice
in the EU, and a patron of Ukraine. The
incoming Polish PM is already in talks with the outgoing one about the position
Poland should defend at the upcoming EU summit.... The Polish political scene nowadays reminds
of the Slovak one: the right-wing
government is lacking a strong and trustworthy left-wing opposition. In such a case, we cannot but wish the
government of the Kaczynski twins with the liberals success, because their
opponents consist of coarse-grained populists."
HUNGARY:
"Two Steps To The Right"
Foreign affairs writer Gabor Miklos stated in
center-left Nepszabadsag (10/25):
“Social groups that would like a ‘Poland of solidarity’ have supported
the winner. They would like to be protected from the market economy and from
foreign powers.…The party of the Kaczynski twins has scored a landslide
victory.... In principle, the road is
open for them to the Fourth Polish Republic, to the moral revolution and to the
showdown with the Communist and Post-Communist past.... It is without question that the President can
only realize his declared goals if he forms an alliance with the anti-European,
anti-modernization and anti-enlightenment forces. With those who have sent him
into the Presidential Palace, and not with the liberals with whom they [his
party] are negotiating about a joint government.... It is likely that the right-wing-conservative
government will be compelled to continue the international politics of its
left-wing predecessor, with even more enthusiasm towards the U.S. and with a bit
more of Euro-skepticism."
"The Fourth Polish Republic"
Foreign affairs editor Gabor Stier declared in right-of-center Magyar
Nemzet (10/25): “The majority having
had enough of the tired politics of the last one-and-a-half decade has voted
for a strong, just and conservative Poland.
A strong one where the centralized state strongly protects the national
interests, a just one which carries through the change of regime, restores
morality, diminishes social differences, and follows conservative values, and
stands up for the family and for Christian values.... It cannot be surprising that the West,
observing the changes of direction in our region with some aversion, is
somewhat is embarrassed by this change, and has lost its very last hope, since
the liberal right-wing alternative that fits European trends better and that,
for lack of any better, they had come to like, has not won in the presidential
election either.”
"Twin Eagle"
Staff writer Eva Elekes wrote in left-of-center Nepszava
(10/25): “President Bush has anxiously asked left-wing President Aleksander
Kwasniewski arriving to say good-bye what he may expect of his, probably
right-wing successor.... Warsaw will
continue to undertake its NATO responsibilities in the future, and Lech
Kaczynski supporting law and order, opposing homosexuality and emphasizing the
importance of Christian values would get on well with President Bush.”
"A Poetic Question"
Endre Aczel asserted in center-left Nepszabadsag
(10/24): "What would it have been
if the Polish voters, even by mere participation, had legitimized the
liberal-conservative view against the clerical-nationalist one? Not much.
The conflict of the visions of the world and future of Kaczynski and
Tusk is not only irrelevant because the parties of these two people will govern
in the future in a coalition, but also because, even in the most positive
sense, the head of the polish state is merely a 'medium strong president,'
practically with no influence on anything except for foreign policy. And if he only has influence on this, let’s
see. The Polish pain can be identified
by two names: the Russian one and the
German one. The anachronistic fear of
the German-Russian conspiracy is hunting the Polish so much that they are
holding on to America in their despair."
IRELAND:
"Poland's Government"
The center-left Irish Times editorialized (10/25): “With the victory of Mr. Lech Kaczynski in
Poland's presidential elections his populist right-wing Law and Justice Party
has won a double endorsement from voters following its success in September's
general elections.... Poland's powerful
bureaucracy will ensure overall continuity in its foreign policy, as will its
interest in budgetary transfers from Brussels.
But there will be anxiety in Berlin and Moscow about future relations
with Poland, and satisfaction in Washington that its pro-American line will be
reinforced. Domestic policy will have
much greater priority. Mr Kaczynski's party wants a new Polish constitution to
promote traditional moral values and a reforming 'fourth republic' based on a
French-style presidential democracy to tackle endemic corruption. He wants to cut taxes, boost pensions and
family benefits and tackle the 18 per cent jobless rate. He will certainly have
a powerful platform to do this in a parliament with so little centrist or
left-wing representation. Some of the
new political divisions in Poland echo those of its neighbours, not least
differences between Dr. Angela Merkel and her CSU partners in Germany.”
POLAND: "We Are
Waiting"
Editor-in-chief Grzegorz Gauden wrote in centrist Rzeczpospolita
(10/24): "Poland faces external and
internal challenges. Among the most
urgent ones is the undetermined shape of the EU budget for 2007-2013, the years
Poland expects to receive resources to substantially modernize the
country. Striving for EU money and
getting it is one thing, effectively managing the funds is another thing. To absorb such huge resources would require
the reform of the state, decentralization, and strengthening of local
governments. The presidential election
campaign and political calculation paralyzed government formation for a
month. The public is fed up with
this. Therefore, both the winner and the
loser must now jointly lead to the establishment of a new government based on a
strong parliamentary coalition. As of
yesterday, electoral programs and slogans ceased to matter. What counts now is the program of
governance. We are waiting."
"The Fourth Republic Of The Kaczynski Brothers"
Editor-in-chief Helena Luczywo opined in liberal Gazeta
Wyborcza (10/24): "The
Kaczynski brothers' party assumes full responsibility for the next four
years. Taking advantage of support from
extreme right and populists, they take on themselves responsibility for not
letting those communities ruin Poland.
Beyond doubt, it is a success of a coalition which distrusts the market
[economy] and European institutions, one that negatively assesses the outcome
of the last 15 years. It would be a bad
thing if the governance of Poland were dominated by the party that fears
modernity, Europe, tolerance, market economy.... Let us believe that the new president will
safeguard the principle of equal rights of citizens before law, that he will
not allow for the appropriation of the state, purges and politicization of all
spheres of life. And in foreign policy,
he will be able to get along with our European partners and neighbors."
ROMANIA:
"A Euro-skeptic Conservative Leading Poland"
Bogdan Munteanu commented In the independent Gandul
(10/25): “In all probability, the new
president will bring significant changes to Poland’s political life that will
also reverberate within the EU....
Kaczynski will have to show he is faithful to the aging and poor
electorate to whom he owes his spectacular victory, so he will not promote any
of the liberal reforms championed by Tusk....
The success of his mandate depends on the practical confirmation of his
incorruptible aura. Without any concrete
results...the capital of trust of the coalition between the president’s twin
brother’s party and Tusk’s Civic Platform runs the risk of collapsing just as
quickly as it was created during the last years of left-wing government.”
"Kaczynski & Kaczynski"
The independent Romania Libera carried an
editorial by Cristian Campeanu (10/25):
“Lech Kaczynski’s program and campaign statements outline a left wing
with an ideology that hasn’t been seen in Eastern Europe for a long time
now.... The fact that he’s an anti-Communist
does not mean that the future president has any sympathy at all for capitalism.
The real test begins now. The two parties are forced to form a coalition if
they want to have a strong government.”
ASIA PACIFIC
INDONESIA: "Kaczynski
And Polish Politics"
Leading independent Kompas commented
(10/26): “Finally Lech Kaczynski, from the conservative Law and Justice Party,
beat Donald Tusk in the Polish presidential election, Sunday.... Under Kaczynski, Poland will be led by a
president who is oriented to the right, and ruled by a conservative coalition
from the same party. There is no strong
center or left camp in the parliament.
In addition to receiving strong support in parliament, the Polish
president constitutionally holds tremendous power. He is the supreme leader of the armed forces
and has major influence in directing economic and foreign policies. He can also veto draft laws. Some worry that the veto power might be used
to change parliament’s plans to bring Poland’s economy to the free market.”
##
Office of Research | Issue Focus | Foreign Media Reaction |
This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State. Links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein. |
IIP Home | Issue Focus Home |