January 19, 2005
TSUNAMI: JAKARTA'S 'IMPUDENT' RESTRICTIONS
REFLECT SOVEREIGNTY WORRY
KEY FINDINGS
** Critics say Jakarta's
statements make clear it is "indifferent" to the fate of Aceh
survivors.
** Indonesian dailies note
a "growing feeling of xenophobia."
** A few papers say
Indonesia's orders "should be respected" given religious concerns.
** Relief effort skeptics
perceive a "hidden agenda" behind U.S. charity.
MAJOR THEMES
'Fear they could lose control' over Aceh-- Papers assailed the "potentates in
Jakarta" for their "short-sighted and morally indefensible"
comments regarding limitations on foreign aid workers in Aceh. Holland's influential NRC Handelsblad
said Indonesian officials are making a "tragic mistake" by seeking to
"reassert their authority" instead of prioritizing aid to
victims. Germany's center-left Sueddeutsche
Zeitung blasted Jakarta's "hunger for power and greed for money,"
adding that the Indonesian military is "not interested in
peace." Hong Kong and Malaysian
writers agreed that "restricting the movement of foreign disaster relief
personnel can only hinder" reconstruction.
The foreigner issue 'must be handled seriously'-- Writers in Indonesia split over restrictions on
the "foreign presence" in Aceh.
Moderate papers said that Indonesians "ought to be grateful"
for the aid. Independent Suara
Pembaruan urged politicians to be "honest that we are not able to
resolve" the crisis "alone" and independent Media Indonesia
labeled the proposal that foreign volunteers leave within two months
"beyond our imagination." But
other writers, fearing "political dependency," judged the
"restrictive" orders "actually make sense" Independent Jawa Pos concluded,
"the sooner the foreign military volunteers return home, the better for
the security and sovereignty of this country."
'Never let foreign powers intervene'-- Citing religious reasons, some papers defended
Jakarta's limits on foreign activity.
Malaysia's government-influenced Berita Harian held that
"Acehnese people are Muslims, and traditionally...do not welcome...foreign
forces." Other media noted concern
that the foreign presence "might harm Indonesia's sovereignty";
Singapore's pro-government Straits Times concluded that
"nationalism remains an issue."
An Austrian daily interpreted the restrictions as a justifiable attempt
to "pacify the Muslim activists" angered by reported plots to
"turn Muslims to Christianity on the pretext of relief efforts." Several dubbed it "wild
speculation" that the U.S. seeks to "de-Islamize" victims.
'A new round of military penetration in Asia'-- Several Asian papers alleged that the U.S.
military's role stemmed from a "profound strategic calculation" that
the Asia-Pacific area is a "new American strategic focus." Pro-PRC Macau Daily News stated the
"large-scale U.S. relief effort is designed to lay the groundwork"
for further U.S. deployments; Seoul's conservative Chosun Ilbo agreed
that the U.S. is treating the disaster "as an opportunity to station its
troops in...an area with a weak American military presence." Thailand's sensationalist Phujatkarn
accused the U.S. of having a "hidden agenda to take over" Aceh.
Prepared by Media Reaction Branch (202)
203-7888, rmrmail@state.gov
EDITOR: Ben Goldberg
EDITOR'S NOTE: Media
Reaction reporting conveys the spectrum of foreign press sentiment. Posts select commentary to provide a
representative picture of local editorial opinion. Some commentary is taken directly from the
Internet. This report summarizes and
interprets foreign editorial opinion and does not necessarily reflect the views
of the U.S. Government. This analysis
was based on 36 reports from 12 countries over 12 - 19 January 2005. Editorial excerpts are listed from the most
recent date.
EUROPE
GERMANY: "Tsunami
Victims"
Center-right Mindener Tageblatt of Minden said (1/13): "Even international relief efforts for
the tsunami victims in Aceh...is now to be distributed only with the approval
by and under the eyes of the military.
The fact that the central government in Jakarta is using emergency
relief as an instrument must reluctantly be accepted by the international
public. But the government in Jakarta is
now demanding a moratorium for its international debt and will need long-term
reconstruction assistance. This is the
means of pressure, which the aiding nations should not give easily away. Debt relief and long-term support should be
linked to conditions which Indonesia must meet before it can get binding
promises by the international community."
"The Greed Of The Generals"
Center-left Sueddeutsche Zeitung of Munich opined
(1/13): "The Indonesian generals
are now showing their true colors. It is
an ugly face distorted by the hunger for power and greed for money. Sympathy in view of the hundreds of thousands
of people who died in the tsunamis is obviously strange to them. The only thing they are worried about is the
fear they could lose control over the Aceh province. The dirty war, which the Indonesian military
is waging against the separatist guerilla forces there, is a lucrative
deal. The armed forces are not
interested in peace and a troop withdrawal, and they are indifferent to the
fate of the people in Aceh.... The
international community cannot simply idly watch these rabid activities. It wants to help the victims in Aceh,
nationalists and separatists.
Indonesia's President Yudhoyono knows this. There was a reason why he hesitated to allow
foreigners to enter the crisis region.
The reputation, which his government enjoys worldwide, is now at
risk. Aceh is not an isolated conflict at
the fringes of the Indonesian empire of islands. The entire people will have have to bear the
consequences if the government in Jakarta proves incapable and unwilling to
master the crisis. It would be the
bankruptcy of the young democracy.
Former general Yudhoyono must decide on which side he stands."
"Impudence Will Lose"
Clemens Wergin argued in centrist Der Tagesspiegel of
Berlin (1/13): "In view of the
global solidarity with the tsunami victims the demand [of the Indonesian
government] is impudent. International
helpers, who at least risk their health, should not allow anyone to treat them
like that. The behavior of the
government in Jakarta shows the arrogance of the powers-that-be.... And obviously the leaders in politics and the
military are also irritated that states and organizations want to help on the
spot and do not want to transfer their donations to the Indonesian government
because they are afraid of the notorious corruption. The global sympathy includes the western
donors to bring along their standards of transparency. It is time that the Indonesian government
adjusts to this fact - in the interest of the victims and all other Indonesians
who have a right to transparent conditions."
"In The Way"
Center-right Saechsische Zeitung of Dresden held
(1/13): "The generals obviously
want to restore their power, which was literally swept away by the water, as
quickly as possible. And international
helpers with and without uniform, let alone journalists, are in their way. In the future they are supposed to account to
them for their activities in Aceh. While
the world is focusing exclusively on the tsunami victims without showing any
religious or political reservations, a few of the powers-that-be in Jakarta
have nothing more important to do that thinking about safeguarding their
power."
AUSTRIA: "Djakarta
Draws The Line"
Markus Bernath opined in independent Der
Standard (1/14): “From Djakarta’s
point of view, the conditions imposed upon the international helpers in the
province of Aceh and the deadline for the foreign troops make sense. Three
months are probably a provisional deadline named by Vice President Yussuf Kalla
to pacify the Muslim activists in the state, which has a population size of 230
million. After all, Indonesia has a long-standing history of political violence
that threatens the unity of the archipelago....
If it is not to the disadvantage of the needy people in Aceh,
Djakarta’s 'political’ limitation of the
international aid initiatives in the province is the more bearable option.
Otherwise the way is paved for Islamic preachers. According to them, the flood
was a punishment of God, they say, and with the West’s help there will be
Christian missions.”
"At The Pillory"
Foreign editor Ernst Heinrich commented in
mass-circulation provincial Kleine Zeitung (1/14): “In Aceh, rebels have been fighting for years
for independence from the central government. It is a brutal battle, both on
the side of the rebels and on that of the army. Then the great flood came.
However, instead of making an attempt at reconciliation, the government is
actually profiting from the ensuing chaos. For now they have the chance to
actually starve the rebels out. Foreign aid workers are only in the way and
therefore obstacles are being put in their way wherever possible. And that is a
scandal for which the potentates in Jakarta ought to be pilloried.”
"What Remains Is Disillusionment"
Hans Kronspiess observed in centrist Die Presse
(1/13): “Now the Indonesian Vice
President has stated clearly and unmistakably that Djakarta will accept foreign
troops in the province of Aceh that has been destroyed by the tsunami only
until the end of March. However, the Vice-President does not only want to send
away the Americans, whom the Indonesians suspect to be power-hungry, but also
Swiss soldiers, for instance. Since it is not to be assumed that the Swiss have
more than a limited interest in political influence in South East Asia, the
question remains of what Indonesia’s government wants? Perhaps it does not want
to be disturbed in its persecution of the separatists in Aceh? This is
possible. Just as it is possible that the government of Sri Lanka neglects
regions where Tamils are active in its distribution of aid resources. What
remains after the first enthusiasm of reconciliation is disillusionment. And a
sad question: How big does a catastrophe
have to be for peace expectations not to be disappointed?
NETHERLANDS:
"Fading Hopes"
Influential independent NRC Handelsblad
maintained (1/14): "The monumental
devastation and suffering in strife-torn Sri Lanka and Aceh initially led to an
unprecedented display of solidarity and even collaboration between the same
government and rebel forces that were archenemies not so long ago.... But hopes of a longer-lasting ceasefire are
rapidly fading, as Jakarta and Colombo take advantage of the humanitarian
tragedy to reassert their authority in the rebel-dominated areas and manoeuvre
their armies into stronger positions....
This is a tragic mistake.... The
presidents of Sri Lanka and Indonesia are unfit for their jobs if they don't at
least try to take advantage of the opportunities created by the tsunami--in
terms of collaboration, dialogue and, possibly, a peace deal. The outside world
must make them see the error of their ways, if only as part of the overall
emergency relief effort."
EAST ASIA
CHINA:
"International Aid Influences International Relations"
Lin Xiaoguang commented in official
international Global Times (Huanqiu Shibao) (1/17): "In the Tsunami disaster relief work,
western countries’ roles and influence are waning. Some western countries’ intent to lead in the
relief work has been aborted....
Developed countries’ political intentions have been manifested very
clearly.... Japanese military experts
indicate that the U.S. intends to show its strength.... Powell also expressed that ‘disaster relief
is an investment in U.S. security'....
The U.S. also hopes to improve its image among Muslims.... Japan has found an opportunity in the Straits
of Malacca. In comparison, the
achievements of developing countries have been recognized by the international
community.... Developing countries have
begun to shed their images as poor countries that only receive assistance. They have played a positive role and have
weakened the leading role of developed countries.... Although developed countries occupy an
advantageous position in the international relations setup, the positive role
of developing countries in international aid will definitely play an important
and far-reaching influence in the development of international relations.”
"Indonesia Asks Foreign Armies To
Withdraw"
Guan Kejiang noted in official international Global
Times (Huanqiu Shibao) (1/14):
"On January 12, Indonesia’s Vice President Jusuf Kalla said that
foreign relief brigades in Indonesia should finish their work and withdraw from
Aceh within three months.... His words
show the Indonesian government’s embarrassing position in regard to the Aceh
relief work.... Foreign armies have
requested that the scope for larger relief activities be enlarged, but some
Indonesian personnel are requesting greater restrictions on foreigners’
behavior. The pressure is getting
heavier.... Western diplomats indicate
that the Indonesian government is worrying that the foreign militaries’
presence might harm Indonesia’s sovereignty....
Aceh is a place where Islam is deep-seated. The entrance of a great number of foreign
military and non-Muslim personnel has made religious extremists very
uneasy. The hidden security trouble in
Aceh is increasing.... The U.S. White
House spokesman said that the U.S. requested an explanation from Indonesia.
...The U.S. will stay there for a rather long time. It is a long-term task.... It seems that the U.S. is unwilling to leave
anytime soon. Meanwhile an anonymous
rumor is spreading in Jakarta: ‘will Indonesia become the U.S. next target
after Iraq?’”
CHINA (HONG KONG AND MACAU SARS): "U.S. Military Uses Relief Work To Strategically
Penetrate Asia"
Pro-PRC Chinese-language Macau Daily News
remarked (1/17): "Since the tsunami
wreaked havoc in the Indian Ocean, U.S. moves to send troops to the frontline
and carry out relief work has attracted international attention. To date, more than 13,000 U.S. soldiers have
been sent to the disaster areas. This
has been the largest scale deployment of U.S. military in Asia since the end of
the Vietnamese war. It shows that the
U.S. is using relief work to start a new round of military penetration in
Asia.... Through the relief work, the
U.S. can expand its military influence in that area. Before the tsunami, U.S. aircraft carriers
could never enter Indonesian waters. And
it was beyond anyone's imagination that U.S. marines would work together with
the armies of Muslim countries. Since
last year, the U.S. has made major adjustments in its military deployment, and
the Asia-Pacific region has become a new American strategic focus. In Asia, U.S. military is focusing on the
Pacific and Indian Oceans.... Now, the
U.S. military and its aircraft carriers can enter this sensitive area. It is clear that the large-scale U.S. relief
effort is designed to lay the groundwork for further U.S. movements in the
Indian Ocean and Asian Pacific region in the future."
"People Must Come Before Politics In
Aceh"
The independent English-language South China Morning Post
editorialized (1/14): "There are
now some 60 different aid organizations operating in Aceh. Soldiers from Australia, Japan, Malaysia,
Singapore and the U.S. are helping with the relief effort. Spanish troops are on the way. This is precisely the response the people of
Aceh needed. There is no hope of
rebuilding their shattered lives unless that international presence is
maintained over the long-term--and unless it is given the freedom it needs to
get on with the job. But the Indonesian
government has other political concerns.
The arrival of so many foreigners in Aceh has loosened the military
control over the province. It has not
been able to keep up the pressure on the rebels. It is also possible that previous rights
abuses by troops will be exposed. These
considerations should not be allowed to hinder the aid effort. There is only one priority--to help the
suffering victims and rebuild Aceh. But
less than three weeks after the disaster, there have been clear signals that
the military is beginning to tighten its grip again.... All that matters now is bringing relief to
the people of Aceh. The Indonesian
government must take the lead. It should
put an end to its short-sighted and morally indefensible attempts to reassert
control over Aceh. It should negotiate
with the rebels and allow the aid operation to continue unhindered."
JAPAN:
"An Opportunity For Indonesia"
The liberal, English-language Japan Times
opined (1/19): "The tragedy is a
humanitarian disaster and providing relief is a formidable challenge for newly
elected President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.
But there is also an opportunity. The need to get relief to hard-hit
Aceh province provides the Jakarta government with an opening to hold talks with
guerrillas fighting for independence in that region as well as a chance to
repair its relations with Western governments concerned about human rights
violations.... Local resentment of the
Indonesian government remains high. The
rebels immediately declared a ceasefire in the aftermath of the quake and it
has been extended throughout the relief effort. It has largely held.... The peace has allowed relief crews to
work.... That presence rankles
Indonesians, and especially the military. The deployment is implicit
recognition that Indonesia cannot do the job itself. Indonesians are fiercely
protective of their sovereignty--understandably so--and the deployments, though
well intended, raise hackles. There are reportedly already grumblings in
Jakarta about the large foreign presence in Indonesia. That the U.S. is playing
a leading role also inspires wild speculation by conspiracy-minded Muslims in
the region. Those sensitivities explain
Jakarta's recent announcements that relief workers would have to declare all
travel and be accompanied by armed escorts, and that all foreign militaries
should be out of the country within three months.... The new rules could create delivery
bottlenecks.... Jakarta's readiness to
wage peace in Aceh and its willingness to embrace greater transparency in
dealing with the province could pay huge dividends. Settling the festering sore
in Aceh will give President Yudhoyono a boost and enhance his legitimacy and
credibility.... The choice seems
clear."
"Expansion Of SDF International Role A
Significant Move"
Top-circulation moderate Yomiuri
editorialized (1/18): "Ongoing
relief efforts by Japan's self-defense forces in tsunami-hit nations
demonstrate the expansion of the SDF's international role.... Most nations struck by the tsunami last
month, including Indonesia and Sri Lanka, are located in the 'Arc of
Instability.' Along with emergency food
and medical aid, long-term assistance is necessary to assist such countries in
rebuilding because regional stability is vital for the security of Japan and
the rest of the world.... Ensuring that
chaos does not arise is said to be one reason behind U.S. relief efforts. Japanese cooperation with the U.N. and the
U.S. in carrying out aid operations is significant because regional stability
is indispensable for Japan's own peace and security."
INDONESIA:
"Controversy Of World Help"
Bandung-based economic-political Pikiran
Rakyat declared (1/19): "The
issue of religion is still sensitive in this country. One of the controversies
under the national spotlight has been the report by The Washington Post,
saying that about 300 children from Aceh have been taken away by WorldHelp and
placed in orphanages and houses belonging to fundamentalist Christians in
Jakarta.... Our question is: Is it true
that there has been an attempt to de-Islamize the 300 children, who are victims
of the disaster in Aceh?"
"Sincerity"
Muslim-intellectual Republika commented
(1/19): "We should praise Indonesia
for opening itself up for assistance from around the world. There is no
restriction to enter all areas in Aceh, which desperately needs help,
especially in dealing with the devastating disaster.... Of course there is concern in the hearts of
many Indonesian people; that’s why President SBY set a timeline to show
flexibility towards the military presence in Aceh, especially the U.S.
military. Again, so long as their presence is purely to help the disaster
victims, we should maintain that flexibility.... Thus, the best thing is, for sure, to use the
assistance to strengthen relations among nations. While for countries that need
help, they should show their openness to everyone. Yet, there is one unchanged
condition that the assistance must be given with full sincerity.”
"The Apostasy Of Acehnese Children Taints
Humanitarian Mission"
Nationalist Medan-based Waspada stated
(1/19): "It’s not enough to only
denounce the taking of hundreds of Acehnese children out of Aceh by a
U.S.-based missionary group. Criticism comes from ulemas and Muslim groups in
Indonesia.... We hope the government
will take firm measures by returning those Acehnese children taken from Aceh.
We must save those children, who are now orphans. Otherwise their culture and
faith could be converted, and that would be a hard blow for Muslims, especially
the Acehnese, as the province now has implemented Islamic law. ”
"A Thought Triggered By Paul Wolfowitz’s
Comment"
Leading independent Kompas commented
(1/18): "The tsunami disaster has
disclosed various problems we face, among other things, how old and limited the
TNI equipment is. The fact seems to be in great contrast when we see warships,
aircraft, helicopters, and other modern and big equipment of other
countries.... The facts stay with our
position when we read press statements from U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense
Paul Wolfowitz, who said that the tsunami disaster shows the importance of
Indonesia-U.S. military cooperation....
The old and outdated TNI equipment is due to the fall of the national
economy and the stance of the supplying countries, such as the U.S. However,
especially for the TNI’s self-existence, we, as a nation, must take a
stance.... Earthquake and tsunami
disasters created momentum full of courage, spirit, direction, and
togetherness. Let’s be smarter and more modest to find out all our benefits.”
"Disaster Situation Has Not Left Aceh"
Leading independent Kompas declared
(1/14): "Minister Alwi Shihab’s
statement that foreign workers working in Aceh must register with the Foreign
Ministry sounds natural. But it is also
natural that the changed policy made just 17 days after the disaster has raised
questions and new interpretations....
Minister Shihab argued that it was not about a political issue but about
the responsibility of the Indonesian government for the safety of foreign
guests in Indonesia. The government
would also be concerned if something happens to the foreign guests working in
Aceh.... Frankly, we are concerned with
this situation because the issue has shifted from the original. The disaster
and the humanitarian issues have been replaced by the political issue. In fact, we must say that Aceh has not fully
recovered from the disaster conditions.
Although three weeks have passed, Aceh has been fully under
control.... Therefore, we call on every
party to exercise restraints. Let us
concentrate first on the efforts to deal with the aftermath of the disaster.
We must first clean up all the affected areas in order to remove the
disaster trauma and the disease threats so that rehabilitation could soon be
carried out.”
"Foreign Volunteers In Aceh"
Independent Media Indonesia stated
(1/14): "Despite the toughness of
our domestic volunteers and the improving coordination by the government after
the tsunami disaster, the situation today and even six months ahead will still
be very difficult. It is beyond our
imagination that the foreign volunteers and all their equipment should be
pulled out within two months from now.
We have to learn to think conceptually rather than reactively. This way we will not plunge into a thinking
pattern in which we take difficult issues easily and complicate issues that are
actually easy.”
"Political Motives Amid Disaster”
Jeffrie Geovanie wrote in independent Suara
Pembaruan (1/13): "On
television we can see how U.S. troops--together with other
volunteers--determinedly help evacuate victims and distribute aid. However,
it’s natural if there are parties who question the motives behind this
humanitarian mission. There are some cases that prove that the
assistance--especially large-scale ones--will create political dependency from
the parties who receive assistance....
So long as the assistance does not disadvantage or even give more
benefits to the people, we should better extend our sympathy rather than
insulting those who participate in this humanitarian mission.”
"Terrible"
Semarang-based economic-political Suara
Merdeka held (1/13): "How
horrible the disaster is! It has aroused international solidarity. But, why
must we be suspicious about the humanitarian missions in Aceh? Can't we
differentiate between political and humanitarian issues? This is the reality,
and this nation has indeed become a low trust society."
"Don't Be Suspicious"
Leading independent Kompas maintained
(1/13): "President Yudhoyono has
warned every element of the Indonesian nation not to
be suspicious about the presence of thousands of
troops from friendly countries in Aceh. They have come here for a humanitarian
mission and to rehabilitate and reconstruct Aceh. Instead, we ought to be
grateful."
"Foreign Nationals Restricted"
Independent Suara Pembaruan said
(1/13): "We recognize that the role
of the foreign workers and forces in helping the victims of the tsunami is by
no means small. Thanks to the foreign
media that reported the magnitude of the suffering of the Indonesian people,
the world has been encouraged to provide their help.... And the foreign forces have been very skilful
in helping the victims and in opening access to the affected areas. In fact, they are very professional and
skilled in managing disaster. But that
does not mean that we cannot do anything by ourselves. Our military is also efficient.... We [only] hope that the government would be
more prudent in issuing regulations that restrict the movement of the foreign
nationals in Aceh because we are dealing with a humanitarian issue. And we have to be honest that we are not able
to resolve it alone.”
"Sooner The Better"
Surabaya-based independent Jawa Pos
advised (1/13): " The
presence of foreign volunteers in Aceh, both military and civilian, must be
handled seriously by the Indonesian government. Indonesia is not Iraq or
Palestine, which requires military volunteers.... The sooner the foreign military volunteers
return home, the better for the security and sovereignty of this country."
"Xenophobia Thicker Than Humanity"
The independent English-language Jakarta Post
editorialized (1/13): "It is
obviously a good move by the TNI Chief Gen. Endriartono Sutarto to say he wants
to ensure the safety of some 2,000 foreign civilians, who are now working on
the humanitarian mission in the tsunami-devastated province.... Although it seems restrictive, the general's
decision to require the volunteers to be escorted by TNI soldiers during trips
outside of Banda Aceh actually makes sense because there is still a war going
on. With seemingly little fear of the many risks inherent, the volunteers have
come here out of a strong sense of compassion for the suffering victims and
have been motivated to help the Acehnese build a totally new life.... So, why then did Gen. Endriartono make such a
controversial decision, while thousands of guests are now in Aceh to help us?
Most of them likely realize the dangers during their humanitarian mission, but
still they have come. Why? Because of a sense of humanity; that is the only
answer for their readiness to take a risk. A risk that may be in the form of
armed gunmen, another earthquake aftershock or malaria. We should thank the
hard-working guests because without their help, the suffering of the victims of
the natural disaster would be much worse....
Despite the radio listeners’ responses, it has become all too evident
from local media reports that there is a growing feeling of xenophobia here, at
least in certain parts of society. We accept the foreigners' relief, but at the
same time we are suspicious of them and do not appreciate what they have done.
From television reports, it has become abundantly clear that the Acehnese have
welcomed the foreigners, including American soldiers. People who live far away
from these appreciative victims still question the foreign presence, while for
victims, they are saviors… Of course, we
also hope the foreign guests realize that they are guests in Aceh, regardless
of how much we need their help. Guests are expected to adapt to the conditions
of their hosts.... We do hope that the
negative statements, xenophobia and a lack of appreciation shown by some
members of society, will not discourage our Samaritan friends. We also hope
they realize that the nation needs and truly appreciates their help.”
MALAYSIA:
"Deadlock"
Malay-language government-influenced Utusan
Malaysia declared (1/18): "The
key to the deadlock in Aceh in fact depends on the willingness of the
leadership of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM).
Unfortunately, both GAM, which has acted wrongly, and the Indonesian
government, which has failed to act effectively, have so far failed to resolve
the existing deadlock.... It is indeed
true that the original goal of GAM is independence for Aceh but in the current
situation, the survival of Acehnese people is more urgent.... What is important is to never let foreign
powers intervene. The Aceh issue needs to be resolved in a family way."
"Indonesia Has The Right To Ask Foreign
Troops To Exit"
Malay-language government-influenced Berita Harian
editorialized (1/14): "The call by
the Indonesian government that foreign troops assisting the tsunami victims in
Aceh leave the country soon should be respected because it has the right to do
so.... We ought to understand the
pressures faced by the government of the republic because the majority of the
Acehnese people are Muslims, and traditionally they do not welcome the arrival
of foreign forces, particularly US and Australian troops."
"All-out Efforts For Disaster Relief Are An
Urgent Priority"
Y.K. Choo opined in Petaling Jaya-based
Chinese-language government-influenced Sin Chew Jit Poh (1/13): "If the Indonesian government and rebel
forces want to win public support, they should not continue to engage in a
senseless dispute, but comprehensively coordinate with foreign armies and
foreign disaster relief personnel, in order to enable more disaster victims to
receive aid promptly, and restore normal life soon. Disputes and restricting
the movements of foreign disaster relief personnel can only hinder the aid
work, and is also the same as stabbing a knife into the disaster victims
again."
SINGAPORE:
"Aid Workers Wade Through Minefield Of Nationalism"
John Mcbeth opined in the pro-government Straits
Times (1/18): "Nationalism,
often tinged with conspiracy theories and a measure of xenophobia, is never far
from the surface in Indonesia....
Several Indonesian journalists are apparently convinced that American
involvement in the international relief operation in tsunami-ravaged Aceh
province was driven more by non-humanitarian motives than anything else. That same nationalism--and the need to
demonstrate that Indonesia is in charge--also appears to have been the reason
for the government's decision to impose a three-month deadline on thousands of
foreign troops. On the surface, it gave
the impression the authorities were ungrateful for their assistance, but
Defence Minister Juwono Sudarsono has just 'clarified' that 'March 26 is not a
deadline.... After initially saying he
wanted all foreign forces out by March 26 or 'the sooner the better',
Vice-President Jusuf Kalla later informed Western diplomats that the deadline
was in fact flexible.... But the most
interesting reaction came from the Indonesian Armed Forces, which has often
been cast as the institution most uncomfortable about the presence of foreign
military forces. 'We need the foreign troops badly,' military commander,
General Endriartono Sutarto, said....
Although the Jakarta government has talked of sending thousands of troop
reinforcements to Aceh to help in the clean up--and perhaps give the appearance
of reinforcing national sovereignty--Gen Sutarto startled observers on Jan 12
by saying that he could not deploy even three battalions because of cost
considerations and worries that it would disturb security in other parts of the
country.... The key to the success of
the aid and recovery operation so far was probably getting the Indonesian
military to take control.... Still,
nationalism remains an issue--particularly with the Muslim-orientated Justice
and Welfare Party--part of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's ruling
coalition--and other Islamic groups....
International and Indonesian officials are reluctant to point a finger
over why ship-borne US marines were forced to scale back their presence on
shore to address Indonesian sensitivities and security concerns. The US aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln
that serves as a key base for relief operations had to leave Indonesian
territorial waters, reportedly because Jakarta objected to routine training
flights by American jet fighters that must go on as part of keeping the
flat-top battle ready. Indonesian government
sources insisted it was an American decision to conform with maritime law.
Whatever the truth, the re-positioning of the carrier added half an hour to
helicopter supply flights."
SOUTH KOREA:
"Washington’s Tsunami Strategy"
Huh Yong-beom wrote in conservative Chosun Ilbo
(1/13): “There is a noteworthy analysis
that the U.S. is taking this tsunami disaster in South Asia as an opportunity
to station its troops in the region, an area with a weak American military
presence. In addition, some see the U.S.
relief effort in the region as being the first field test or application drill
for the realignment of U.S. troops and their transformation into rapid response
forces, which has been pursued by the U.S. military.... Washington might feel unappreciated if we
entirely ignore the humanitarian aspect of the U.S. relief effort. However, it is true that the intensity of the
current U.S. relief effort, which even necessitates the pullout of USFK
helicopters, goes beyond the level of a simple relief operation.... The U.S. did not act like this when a
destructive hurricane killed last summer 2,000 people in Haiti, a small island
country off its coast, and nor has it provided this kind of aid in Sudan,
despite the fact that the tens of thousands of Sudanese have lost their lives
and millions are left homeless in the Darfur dispute.... Washington appears to have completed
something of a profound strategic calculation.
Is it something that concerns the U.S. alone?”
THAILAND: "It Comes
With The Tsunami"
'Siri-Unya' (pseudonym) observed in sensationalist,
business-oriented Phujatkarn (1/14):
" “It is now a known fact that America and Japan knew in advance
that there would be an earthquake in the sea near Sumatra Island.... But they only did what was necessary to
protect themselves. That’s why U.S.
military bases and networks in the Indian Ocean including its military base on
Diego Garcia Island remain intact....
Why were they so cruel? People
around the world are asking this question....
Most recently, there have been some strange news reports that deserve
our interest. Firstly, America has moved
at least 15,000 troops and heavy weapons from Okinawa to this region and it
remains unclear what their destinations are.
Secondly, U.S. marines have landed in Aceh.... Thirdly, America has come in to use the
U-Tapao airbase and moved some of its military supplies here, claiming they are
for relief assistance in the region. The
U-Tapao airbase used to be a U.S. military base during the Vietnam War and
American troops had to withdraw because a major rally by the Thai people drove
them away at the end of the last century....
Now that the U-Tapao airbase has already been taken, maybe Thai pundits
and patriots can answer whether or not we have lost our territory or
sovereignty.”
"Disappointed"
'Siang Sao Long' (pseudonym) commented in sensationalist,
business-oriented Phujatkarn (1/12):
"I was disappointed with the warning systems of the U.S. and
Japan. They had the information about
the undersea earthquake but would not warn Thailand and the other nine
countries about the tidal wave.... Today
I would like to list all U.S. post-Tsunami roles for us to look at. Firstly, the initial U.S. offer of only 2
million dollars which was then increased to 350 million dollars after a barrage
of criticism worldwide. Secondly, let’s
take a look to see if U.S. relief efforts have any hidden agenda. The U.S. has
sent its troops and heavy military supplies to Aceh, Indonesia. Such deployment, although said to be for the
purpose of relief efforts, is tantamount to a legal military landing with a
hidden agenda to take over the province....
I’m not saying that we should refuse anything American...but we should
think carefully about Thailand’s status in the new round of the Cold War.”
SOUTH ASIA
INDIA:
"Reality Of U.S. Assistance"
Pro-Muslim biweekly Dawat declared
(1/13): "An important aspect of the
whole US relief efforts after the tsunami disaster is the special attention
given to Indonesia. Of course, Indonesia with the largest number of tsunami
victims is the worst affected country. But, the reason of the American special
interest is rooted in its characteristic selfishness and the tradition of
earning political advantage even out of human tragedies. The American
establishment and the media has unleashed a propaganda campaign on how the US
was providing all out relief to 'Muslim' Indonesia. The emphasis is more on the
Muslim identity of the country than the gravity of the tragedy. With this
propaganda campaign, the US has sought to make the Muslim world believe that it
is always been on their side whenever they needed help. Such an effort is
probably based on the premise that world Muslims are not aware of its animosity
against Islam and Muslims and of the oppressive measures and brutal atrocities
that it has committed itself or actively supported in Afghanistan, Iraq,
Palestine and elsewhere while many others kept under constant threat. It has
now become clear without a shed of doubt that the so-called war on terror is
solely targeted against Islam, Muslims, Muslim organizations and Muslim
countries. It is the US that has most actively and prominently helped Israel in
depriving Palestinians of their legitimate rights and targeting them with most
inhuman atrocities. Now, by offering help to Indonesia and publicizing it
through global media campaign, the US is under the illusion of winning the
Indonesian heart and convincing the Muslim world of its humane and friendly
character. The grievances of the world Muslim community against the US are
caused by its enmity, aggression and prejudice against Islam and Muslims that
the latter has been practicing for decades all over the world. Unless there is
a real and visible change in the anti-Muslim policies of Washington, how can
Muslims change their opinion against the US?"
PAKISTAN:
"U.S. Organizations Making Efforts To Turn Tsunami Victims To
Christianity"
Urdu-language second-largest Nawa-e-Waqt alleged
(1/18): "An organization which
represents U.S.-based Muslims has urged President Bush that those groups must
be stopped which are attempting to turn Muslims to Christianity on the pretext
of relief efforts in the tsunami hit areas.
Council on American Relations (CAIR) says that the activities of this
group are damaging the U.S.’ image. CAIR
claims that its Washington office has received an email from Virginia Liberty
University Chancellor Jerry Falwell which asks for donations for the tsunami
victims. The mail also says that a large
number of Muslim population there has never heard the words like Christianity
and Judaism. The email message says
Liberty University’s Director of International Crusade will lead this relief
effort team and this team, along with relief goods, will also distribute the
literature based on Jesus’ teachings,’ the CAIR says."
"Politicizing Tsunami"
Karachi-based center-left independent national English-language Dawn
asserted (1/17): "The generous
outpouring of sympathy and financial aid for the tsunami victims by donors from
across the world is contrasted sharply with the politics played out by some
countries, including those that bore the brunt of the disaster. Indonesia has warned foreign aid workers not
to venture out without a military escort to the affected areas in its erstwhile
rebel Aceh province. Sri Lanka last week
refused to let the UN secretary-general visit rebel-controlled territories in
its northern and eastern parts."
##
Office of Research | Issue Focus | Foreign Media Reaction |
This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State. Links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein. |
IIP Home | Issue Focus Home |